Coal Preparation                                   » Fine Coal                                         
This project was  concerned with the development and  validation of an improved laboratory  flotation test designed to "fingerprint"  the ultimate flotation performance that  can be achieved for a particular coal  feed. It is important to note that the  aim was to measure a characteristic of  the coal feed itself, not of the  particular type of flotation device  employed. 
  The benefit to the industry comes from  being able to measure true recovery loss,  and hence minimise this through process  improvement. It is estimated that 18  million tonnes of coal per annum are  treated in Australia by flotation. A one  percent improvement in flotation yield  translates to approximately ten million  dollars of export revenue. It is not  possible for plant operators to be aware  of their individual losses unless a  suitable "ultimate" flotation  performance test is available.
  The problem with the existing method (Australian  Standard AS4156.2.2-1994, and its  variants) is that it is highly operator  sensitive, very time and hence cost  intensive, and totally inaccurate unless  undertaken by a highly skilled operator.  The problem with the method is twofold; (1)  slime entrainment in concentrate, and (2)  time requirement to undertake the test. A  new method needs to be able to clearly  and simply delineate true flotation from  entrainment flotation. In practice, a 1%  clay slimes contamination to product  translates directly to a 1% concentrate  mineral matter increase. In modern high-intensity  flotation practice (Jameson Cell and  Microcel), entrainment is eliminated  through the use of clean counter-current  wash water through the froth phase.
  [It is important to note, that prior  to the commencement of this project, the  only recognised coal flotation  characterisation test was the BHP tree  method. The Australian Standard method  represents an abbreviated form of this  test and gives a wide variety of results.  Thus the BHP method was employed as the  "benchmark" against which to  evaluate the new method.]
  This project developed and investigated a  modified bench scale mechanical flotation  cell apparatus. The modified apparatus  sought to solve the problems with the  standard method by utilising wash water  and a continuous tailings recirculation  technique. A workable method was  developed and tested for reproducibility  using three independent operators and two  independent laboratories, all of whom had  nothing to do with the development of the  procedure.
  The procedure developed does not  perfectly reproduce the "ultimate  flotation response" however the  results show that the main areas of  interest on the yield-ash curve are  determined with the following key  advantages of the method:
  
   - The test procedure is fast compared to the traditional BHP tree method. One test takes a total duration of approximately two hours to complete.
  - The analysis requirements are greatly reduced, with only 12-15 samples requiring analysis compared to more than 50 in the case of the BHP tree
  - The test method requires only 300-500g of coal, which means it can be employed on small samples such as those obtained from borecore samples.
   
  
  The project was led by Dr Bruce Atkinson  and Mr Steve Blanshard of Jetflote Pty  Ltd, and the project work was primarily  undertaken by Ms Tracey Rose of BHP  Research - Newcastle Laboratories, with  support from Mr Ray Keast-Jones.