ACARP ACARP ACARP ACARP
Open Cut

Improved Recovery in Highwall Mining Using Backfill

Open Cut » Highwall Mining

Published: June 97Project Number: C3052

Get ReportAuthor: Richard Hume | BFP Consultants, Barrett Fuller and Partners

This report presents the studies undertaken within ACARP project C3052, entitled 'Improved Recovery in Highwall Mining Using Backfill'.  The aims of the project are to examine current fill practice as it applies to highwall mining, to determine, at a conceptual study level, whether fill could be economically applied, to trial key aspects of fill behaviour and to outline a feasibility study for any worthwhile ongoing development.  he objectives are to review the issues, to map out the possible filling methods and to cost and rank them, to undertake laboratory testing of fill materials and to outline field testing and feasibility of fill strategies.

The methodology for the review involved:

  • setting criteria for the fill materials and for the filling methods,
  • examining the different mining strategies that may apply in thin and thick seam mining,
  • reviewing relevant current fill practice in both coal and metalliferous mining worldwide,
  • examining advances in applicable technology in the cement and concrete industries,
  • selecting a range of relevant filling methods and costing them at a conceptual level (at the expected productivity on the basis of complete filling),
  • examining other issues that may affect costs,
  • setting the required parameters of the fill material for laboratory testing and testing of the selected fill materials, and
  • resolving the appropriate areas for modelling, field and feasibility studies.

In Australia, filling has not been adopted in coal mines, often due to a view that it would be uneconomic and of little benefit at prevailing export prices of coal. This may be true in underground situations with current mining reserves where high recoveries can be achieved without subsidence becoming a major cost issue.

In highwall mining however, recoveries are not high and both subsidence of the highwall and the maintenance of good stable and safe working conditions during extraction are of prime importance.

Metalliferous mining practice has been to develop fills tailored to specific applications when conventional fills would not apply. For highwall mining, the emphasis for filling needs to be on the lateral distribution of fill, on tight filling and on using the available materials. In many cases there is no local cementitous material, the immediate tailings supply (such as fine washery reject) is less than the overall fill demand and the cost of using reclaimed tailings is high if not pre-planned.

Therefore the fill materials will predominantly be aggregates from either coarse washery reject or spoil pile material.

In this study, information from the literature survey was used to detail the criteria for fill selection and current fill practice and experience. The discussion on criteria for fill selection included discussion on geotechnical criteria, environmental criteria, economic and production criteria, and safety and regulatory requirements.

The discussion on current fill practice and experience looked at metalliferous mining practice (placement techniques, material properties, benefits and costs), coal mining practice (overseas experience in Germany, Poland, India, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States and Australia) and alternative technology (integrated materials, co-disposal, cellular foam concrete, water absorbing / water reducing materials and accelerators and retarders).

The discussion of mining requirements considered single pass and two pass operation on thin seams and single pass, full height and single pass per lift, two lifts for thick seams.

Relevant data for filling options and costs were obtained from site visits to both Oaky Creek and Moura Mines.

Seven different methods were defined and were cost based on a fill production of 15,000m³/wk on two 10 hour shifts per day, seven days a week. The methods costed were:

  • placing a fluid aggregate fill via boreholes;
  • conveying an aggregate fill into the holes and ejecting it on retreat;
  • trucking an aggregate fill into the holes and slinging it into place;
  • trucking an aggregate fill into the holes and ramming it into place;
  • placing a hydraulic fill from boreholes or fill lines in the holes;
  • placing pneumatic fill on retreat from a line pushed into the hole; and
  • using the mining unit to carry fill lines or to convey the fill and place fill on retreat.

The most cost effective methods of placement are to use the miner on retreat either by using the coal transporting equipment in reverse (method 7) or by laying a pneumatic system on the miner for use as it retreats (method 6). In each case a slinger or stower would eject the material over the miner to the face for the retreat or would move to a forward ejection position for the retreat. Separate conveyors or pipelines for pneumatics or hydraulic placement are other useful options.

Further Work

The conceptual studies for this project should be supported by field testing which should concentrate on confirming methods for localised placement of fills and for assessing the performance of hydraulic fill placed in inclined excavations.

Geotechnical modelling can be used to check the effectiveness of the various fill alternatives and the effectiveness of different filling strategies, even if it is based on preliminary information, because there is a need to minimise the number of alternative strategies and equipment options that could be developed.

The field study and geotechnical modelling should be followed by a feasibility study to confirm their operational practicability in particular site situations.

The first task would be to do a detailed costing study specific to the site targeting for the feasibility study.

Site Specific Costing Study

The site specific costing study is aimed at completing similar conceptual studies to those completed in this report but targeted specifically to the costs for a site and to the mining strategies likely to be adopted by the site. The site chosen should be the site for the feasibility study to determine the likely benefits to that site and to set a framework for the review of the feasibility study. The likely cost of the study is $25,000 t $30,000.

Field Testing

It is proposed that field trials be conducted to trial borehole and hydraulic placement techniques in formats and of a scale that are applicable to highwall mining. The primary issue is obtaining commitment and choosing the test site.

In addition, it is suggested that a re-entry vehicle be built for simple hole inspections to gain experience on equipment re-entering 'holes'. In the event that filling is useful, remote hole access will be needed to check on ground conditions, methane build up and excess groundwater in old holes. This will be done well prior to equipment entry, even as a check prior to commitment to using fill.

No budget is given for the field testing as it is likely to be site dependent. It was originally intended to undertake field testing at a site which would have borne the cost of the trials.

Geotechnical Modelling

The aim is to evaluate the geotechnical benefits of filling and so to estimate the additional recovery that could occur.

This is not seen as a major geotechnical problem, except in terms of predicting the behaviour of thin pillars and the effect of adjacent fill on their performance. Experts in this field have been approached for their contribution to the prediction of the performance of thin pillars both with and without fill.

Because of the considerable number of alternative mining situations that could be examined the work will be restricted to three or four basic situations that have been selected to illustrate what is involved in filling and the geotechnical benefits of fill. A preliminary budget estimate for the geotechnical modelling is $15K.

Feasibility Study Requirements

It is proposed that a feasibility study be undertaken to define the project requirements that are necessary to prove up a method or methods for filling of highwall mining operations to the end of the feasibility stage. At the end of this study, the technical feasibility should be resolved, the operating and capital costs known to 15% accuracy and a schedule developed for the development and implementation of the relevant approach. Trials of approaches and equipment development will need to be included in the costings. The study program has been drawn together as a preliminary guide to further development as there are quite a number of options depending on the particular highwall situation.

The provisional budget estimate for this work is $3,000,000.

Underground

Health and safety, productivity and environment initiatives.

Recently Completed Projects

C21013Improving Cavity Prediction On Longwall Faces Through A Combination Of Reliable Convergence, Canopy Attitude And Leg Pressure Monitoring

Most Australian coal mines have shield leg pressure monitoring in real t...

C24014Distributed Acoustic Conveyor Monitoring

CRC Mining have investigated the application of fibre optic Distribu...

C25054Distributed Acoustic Conveyor Monitoring - Phase 2

This project is phase 2 of the distributed acoustic sensing project ...

Underground

Open Cut

Safety, productivity and the right to operate are priorities for open cut mine research.

Recently Completed Projects

C23053A Study Of Sustainability And Profitability Of Grazing On Mine Rehabilitated Land In The Upper Hunter NSW

This study was initiated by the Upper Hunter Mining Dialogue (UHMD) ...

C25035Coal Subsurface Mapping For Open Cut Selective Mining

A reliable coal seam sensing system is required to improve the produ...

C23025Coal Pit Lake Closure By River Flow Through: Risks And Opportunities

In 2011, the river diversion channel around Lake Kepwari, a former o...

Open Cut

Coal Preparation

Maximising throughput and yield while minimising costs and emissions.

Recently Completed Projects

C26007 Revised Dustiness And DEM Test Method (Update Of AS4156.6) Part 2:Preparation

In 2015 project C23054 investigated and reviewed the Australian Stan...

C22033Advanced Control And Optimisation Of DMC Operation

The objective of this project was to develop, implement and demonstr...

C24045Adaptation Of Coal Grain Analysis To Improve Flotation Yield Estimation

Yield estimation from resource data is notoriously difficult. Facto...

Coal Preparation

Technical Market Support

Market acceptance and emphasising the advantages of Australian coals.

Recently Completed Projects

C25045Stage Two - Assessment Of In Situ High-Temperature Strength Of Cokes

Stage I of this project established a reliable and repeatable proces...

C25044Trace Elements In Coal; Status Of Test Methods In Use And Their Applicability

 STAGE 1 REPORT

The key objectives of this stage...

C25042Mechanistic Model Of Coke Development In A Coke Oven Situation

The standard approach to evaluate the potential of coals or blends t...

Technical Market Support

Mine Site Greenhouse Mitigation

Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from the production of coal.

Recently Completed Projects

C24061Proof-Of-Concept Photocatalytic Destruction Of Methane For Coal Mining Fugitive Emissions Abatement

Australia's fugitive emissions in 2015 were 41 Mt CO2-e (representin...

C23052Novel Stone Dust Looping Process For Ventilation Air Methane Abatement - Phase 3

This multi‐phase project is concerned with the mitigation of m...

C19054VAM Enrichment With A Two-Stage Adsorption Process

Treatment of ventilation air methane (VAM) with cost-effective technolog...

Mine Site Greenhouse Mitigation

Low Emission Coal Use

Step-change technologies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Recently Completed Projects

C17060BGasification Of Australian Coals

Four Australian coals were trialled in the Siemens 5 MWth pilot scale ga...

C17060AOxyfuel Technology For Carbon Capture And Storage Critical Clean Coal Technology - Interim Support

The status of oxy-fuel technology for first-generation plant is indicate...

C18007Review Of Underground Coal Gasification

This report consists of a broad review of underground coal gasification,...

Low Emission Coal Use

Mining And The Community

The relationship between mines and the local community.

Recently Completed Projects

C16027Assessing Housing And Labour Market Impacts Of Mining Developments In Bowen Basin Communities

The focus of this ACARP-funded project has been to identify a number...

C22029Understanding And Managing Cumulative Impacts Of Coal Mining And Other Land Uses In Regions With Diversified Economies

The coal industry operates in the context of competing land-uses that sh...

C23016Approval And Planning Assessment Of Black Coal Mines In NSW And Qld: A Review Of Economic Assessment Techniques

This reports on issues surrounding economic assessment and analysis ...

Mining And The Community

NERDDC

National Energy Research,Development & Demonstration Council (NERDDC) reports - pre 1992.

Recently Completed Projects

1609-C1609Self Heating of Spoil Piles from Open Cut Coal Mines

Self Heating of Spoil Piles from Open Cut Coal Mines

1301-C1301Stress Control Methods for Optimised Development...

Stress Control Methods for Optimised Development and Extraction Operations

0033-C1356Commissioned Report: Australian Thermal Coals...

Commissioned Report: Australian Thermal Coals - An Industry Handbook

NERDDC