ACARP ACARP ACARP ACARP
Underground

Improving Cavity Prediction on Longwall Faces Through a Combination of Reliable Convergence, Canopy Attitude and Leg Pressure Monitoring

Underground » Strata Control and Windblasts

Published: July 18Project Number: C21013

Get ReportAuthor: Robert Trueman | Golder Associates

Most Australian coal mines have shield leg pressure monitoring in real time to aid the identification and remediation of roof control problems and to assist in the identification of faulty legs and yield valves. Newer longwalls are now equipped with tilt sensors that allow convergence measurements in real time, albeit at a resolution that is sub-optimal. During ACARP project C21013, shield convergence data was obtained from 2 sites. Tilt sensors developed by CSIRO with a convergence resolution of about 0.8 mm were installed on 6 shields at the Austar Mine and data obtained. At this time Caterpillar installed tilt sensors with a resolution of about 8 mm on all shields at the Narrabri mine and data was also obtained from this site. From a back-analysis of this data, C21013 demonstrated that it is not possible to obtain a reliable understanding of how shield supports interact with the strata from leg pressures alone. It was demonstrated that a much greater understanding of shield-strata interaction is possible from shield convergence measurements. With the limited amount of back-analysis obtained from these two sites, it was not possible to develop reliable convergence triggers that could predict the on-set of roof control problems.

An extension project was approved to enable data to be obtained from additional sites. Additional leg pressure and convergence data was obtained from Broadmeadow Mine and the Dendrobium Mine, who have Joy tilt sensors installed on all shields. The Joy tilt sensors have a similar resolution to the Caterpillar sensors.  Additional convergence and leg pressure data were obtained from Narrabri. CSIRO tilt sensors were installed on 6 shields at Newlands North and convergence and leg pressure data obtained. The leg pressure and convergence data from all these sites were back-analysed with the aim of developing reliable triggers of impending roof control problems in advance of mining using the LVA program.

 

The following convergence triggers have been found to correlate well with the formation of cavities, on at least 10 out of 20 adjacent shields:

· A convergence in a single cycle of ≥ 80 mm;

· An average convergence rate of ≥ 50 mm/hr; and

· A cumulative convergence over 3 consecutive cycles of ≥ 200 mm.

 

It was found that these were triggered mainly from 1 to 3 shears in advance of any roof control problems occurring although on occasions they are only triggered within the shear that the roof control problems occur. A load cycle is the time from setting of the support to releasing the support.

 

The only leg pressure signal that has been found to give any indication of impending roof control problems is the initial pre-yield loading rate. A pre-yield loading rate for at least 10 out of 20 adjacent shields of 10 to 15 bar per minute has been found to be the trigger level for impending roof control problems. This signal can be very unreliable, particularly where high set pumps are employed. It is often very difficult to judge when the pressure rise in shield legs is a result of the strata loading the shields or is a result of the pumps. High set pumps are now employed on the majority of longwalls in Australia. It is noted that the majority of longwalls in Australia do not currently have reliable convergence monitoring installed. An improvement in determining the time that the support is set and the pumps have ceased operating is required to make the pre-yield loading rate more reliable in the LVA program when high set pumps are enabled. This is not a simple task.

 

A rigorous analysis of the trigger levels noted above was initiated. It was found that cycle delineation within the LVA program was not accurate enough for this purpose. This is not a criticism of the program. To achieve better cycle delineation required research versions of the LVA program to be written. This was time consuming, as it needed to be site-specific and the programs so developed are not reliable enough yet to be a commercial product.

 

The research programs were then used to rigorously analyse the trigger levels. In general it was found that the trigger levels were about 80% accurate; i.e. the trigger levels accurately gave a warning of roof control issues in about 80% of the time. In the remaining about 20% of the time, the majority were false positives; i.e. the TARPs were triggered, but no cavities occurred. In the last two thirds of LW9 at Broadmeadow the amount of false positives significantly increased to about 60%, when using TWAP and low set pressures to indicate that cavities were occurring.

 

Time consuming analyses were carried out to understand the dramatic decrease in the accuracy of the trigger levels at Broadmeadow over this period, which necessitated both the use of the research version of the LVA program noted above and a great deal of manual analyses of the LVA trending data. The analyses concluded that the most likely reason was that operators were setting adequately when roof cavities and/or guttering were occurring and that cavities were not able to be detected by the LVA program. Changes in shield height between  load cycles was used to determine if cavities had likely occurred and the accuracy of the triggers were determined to be about 80% using this method of cavity detection. It is noted that the use of changes in shield height between load cycles to determine the existence of roof cavities is not 100% certain. However, if the researchers' conclusions are indeed correct this is a very important observation. The researchers have been expounding the hypothesis that roof control problems can be significantly ameliorated on many occasions if adequate set pressures are attained when roof conditions deteriorate to the extent that guttering and cavities have occurred. This entails a trade-off between canopy attitudes and set pressures, which most operators are reluctant to engage in. In some situations (e.g. when cavities are high) such a trade-off is of course not possible. Further work is warranted to determine in the LVA program when cavities are occurring, which may need additional longwall monitoring signals to be captured by the program.

 

In the majority (>70%) of occasions, the analyses indicated that the TARPs were triggered ≥1 shear in advance of roof control problems occurring and impending roof control problems were detected up to 5 shears in advance. That does mean in about a quarter of occasions the TARPs are only able to determine the onset of roof control problems in the shear that they occur.

 

Please note, the stage one report and movie file are found within the attachment link, when you download this report.

 

An e-newsletter has also been published for stage one of this project, highlighting its significance for the industry.

Underground

Health and safety, productivity and environment initiatives.

Recently Completed Projects

C21013Improving Cavity Prediction On Longwall Faces Through A Combination Of Reliable Convergence, Canopy Attitude And Leg Pressure Monitoring

Most Australian coal mines have shield leg pressure monitoring in real t...

C24014Distributed Acoustic Conveyor Monitoring

CRC Mining have investigated the application of fibre optic Distribu...

C25054Distributed Acoustic Conveyor Monitoring - Phase 2

This project is phase 2 of the distributed acoustic sensing project ...

Underground

Open Cut

Safety, productivity and the right to operate are priorities for open cut mine research.

Recently Completed Projects

C26019Prediction Of Long Term Erosion At Pit Walls

The objective of this project was to provide a basis for estimating ...

C26033Geotechnical Hazard Awareness Video For Open Cut Coal Mines

THERE IS NO FINAL REPORT AVAILABLE FROM THE ACARP WEBSITE - DO NO...

C23053A Study Of Sustainability And Profitability Of Grazing On Mine Rehabilitated Land In The Upper Hunter NSW

This study was initiated by the Upper Hunter Mining Dialogue (UHMD) ...

Open Cut

Coal Preparation

Maximising throughput and yield while minimising costs and emissions.

Recently Completed Projects

C24045Adaptation Of Coal Grain Analysis To Improve Flotation Yield Estimation

Yield estimation from resource data is notoriously difficult. Facto...

C25017Leveraging Detailed Maceral Component Information From CGA

Since Project C18041 was completed, the CSIRO image analysis softwar...

C25010Optimising The Performance Of Tailings Dewatering In A Solid Bowl Centrifuges

This tailings dewatering study was undertaken to provide a link betw...

Coal Preparation

Technical Market Support

Market acceptance and emphasising the advantages of Australian coals.

Recently Completed Projects

C25042Mechanistic Model Of Coke Development In A Coke Oven Situation

The standard approach to evaluate the potential of coals or blends t...

C25050Overview Of Outcomes Of Research Supported By ACARP And NERDDC On The Utilisation Of Coking Coals, 1978-2014

The Australian coal industry has funded a substantial body of work o...

C25046Using High Range Mass Spectrometry To Study The Link Between Coal Structure, Coke Strength And Thermoplastic Chemistry In Blends

This project investigated the use of Laser Desorption/Ionisation tim...

Technical Market Support

Mine Site Greenhouse Mitigation

Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from the production of coal.

Recently Completed Projects

C24061Proof-Of-Concept Photocatalytic Destruction Of Methane For Coal Mining Fugitive Emissions Abatement

Australia's fugitive emissions in 2015 were 41 Mt CO2-e (representin...

C23052Novel Stone Dust Looping Process For Ventilation Air Methane Abatement - Phase 3

This multi‐phase project is concerned with the mitigation of m...

C19054VAM Enrichment With A Two-Stage Adsorption Process

Treatment of ventilation air methane (VAM) with cost-effective technolog...

Mine Site Greenhouse Mitigation

Low Emission Coal Use

Step-change technologies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Recently Completed Projects

C17060BGasification Of Australian Coals

Four Australian coals were trialled in the Siemens 5 MWth pilot scale ga...

C17060AOxyfuel Technology For Carbon Capture And Storage Critical Clean Coal Technology - Interim Support

The status of oxy-fuel technology for first-generation plant is indicate...

C18007Review Of Underground Coal Gasification

This report consists of a broad review of underground coal gasification,...

Low Emission Coal Use

Mining And The Community

The relationship between mines and the local community.

Recently Completed Projects

C16027Assessing Housing And Labour Market Impacts Of Mining Developments In Bowen Basin Communities

The focus of this ACARP-funded project has been to identify a number...

C22029Understanding And Managing Cumulative Impacts Of Coal Mining And Other Land Uses In Regions With Diversified Economies

The coal industry operates in the context of competing land-uses that sh...

C23016Approval And Planning Assessment Of Black Coal Mines In NSW And Qld: A Review Of Economic Assessment Techniques

This reports on issues surrounding economic assessment and analysis ...

Mining And The Community

NERDDC

National Energy Research,Development & Demonstration Council (NERDDC) reports - pre 1992.

Recently Completed Projects

1609-C1609Self Heating of Spoil Piles from Open Cut Coal Mines

Self Heating of Spoil Piles from Open Cut Coal Mines

1301-C1301Stress Control Methods for Optimised Development...

Stress Control Methods for Optimised Development and Extraction Operations

0033-C1356Commissioned Report: Australian Thermal Coals...

Commissioned Report: Australian Thermal Coals - An Industry Handbook

NERDDC