Open Cut                                           » Environment                                       
    Three  primary objectives were set for this project, these are: 
              - To identify the best growth media for the  establishment of native forest communities in spoil and pasture soil and to  test secondary and tertiary treatments such as inoculation with soil microbes. 
         - To set up a field research facility at Mount Owen  mine and a verification site at Warkworth mine to study the establishment,  growth and sustainability of a dry sclerophyll forest community that further  develops current links between the industry and The University of Newcastle. 
         - To provide a benchmark site for future forest  rehabilitation and develop a process by which reliable measures of  sustainability can be achieved. 
       
      Increasingly  consent conditions in the Hunter Valley include reconstruction of native  vegetation on parts of rehabilitation sites or in offset areas. To achieve this  may require the spreading of forest or woodland soil, pasture soil, or the use  of ameliorated spoil. Often soil, be it forest or pasture, is composed of badly  degraded B-horizon material that had has lost its A-horizon due to land  clearing and grazing activities that preceded mining. The soil that remains,  especially pasture soil, has also been invaded in many cases by a broad range  of weeds. Hence, reverting land use back to forest or woodland has the added  difficulty of weed competition, as deep ripping the surface of the soil tends  to promote weed germination and growth. This is particularly true if the soil  has been stockpiled. 
      This  project provided the opportunity to formally test the value of a number of  alternate media for use in the rehabilitation of spoil placement areas at open  cut coal mines. In addition, the establishment of a Field Research Facility at  Mount Owen Mine together with a verification site at Warkworth Mine provides  the opportunity for longer-term studies of species persistence in  rehabilitation sites and the development of community structure and function. 
      The  results we have shown indicate general consistency across all of the trials, but  differences in the field and pot trials as anticipated. These differences  largely relate to water supply and weed competition. We have also begun to  develop a long-term measure of success based on real-life events relative to a  reference site and demonstrated the outcomes using pot and field trials. The  concept of ecological resistance, and the measure of success, relative  conditional probability, will continue to be developed. 
      The  successful completion of this study was despite three major rain events at  Mount Owen and one at Warkworth that interfered with the integrity of the  trial. Fortunately the power in the experimental design used is such that the  rain events did not cause a loss of the trial. This has been demonstrated in  the analysis presented in this report and ought to encourage the mining  industry to utilize formal experimental science in its pursuit of knowledge to  assist it achieve its desired outcomes. 
      On  the basis of the results gained so far from the two sites, we recommend that: 
              - Wherever available, and possible, direct-transfer  forest topsoil should be used for rehabilitation, as it produces the highest  native plant density and species richness. 
         - The best alternative to forest topsoil was found to  be a plastic subsoil. Subsoil and plastic pre-strip should therefore be  stockpiled separately from spoil for future use where insufficient forest or  woodland soil is available to meet rehabilitation demand. 
         - As not all subsoils will be suitable for  rehabilitation due to some being highly dispersive, they should be trialled in  properly designed, scientific experiments prior to large-scale use. 
         - If using other topsoil such as woodland topsoil, it  should be assessed prior to large-scale use because Warkworth woodland topsoil,  that had been heavily grazed, was no more successful than bare spoil. 
         - Pasture topsoil with large weed and grass seed  banks as found at Mount Owen and Warkworth, should not be used for native  forest reconstruction, using seeding, without amelioration to combat the weeds  and grasses. Preliminary results suggest that capping pasture topsoil with  either chitter1 or pasture subsoil and without deep ripping, may be a way of  reconstructing forest and woodland using seed on weed infested, stockpiled  pasture topsoil. 
         - A trial should be set up to test whether capping  biosolids with a weed and grass free medium will overcome the negative  competitive effects found in biosolids for the reconstruction of  forest-woodland vegetation. 
         - Secondary treatments such as fertilizer and worm  casts showed the potential to increase plant growth in the secondary treatment  pot trial. However, no response was observed in the field. 
         - Dose response experiments should be conducted on  the secondary treatments to verify or adjust the application rate appropriate  for use with native vegetation. 
         - The Ecological Resistance Model that is under  development and utilizes relative conditional probability could be compared to  alternatives such as “Ecosystem Function Analysis” (Ludwig et al. 2003) and  “Habitat Hectares” (Parkes et al. 2003), to compare its usefulness as a tool in  rehabilitation management.